President Prabowo Subianto recently made statements regarding alleged elements of treason and terrorism in recent demonstrations. These remarks have sparked varied public reactions, including calls for the president to establish a Joint Fact-Finding Team (TGPF) to uncover the realities behind these events. The situation has raised public concern and the potential for heightened conflict in the future.
Head of the Center for Security and Peace Studies, Universitas Gadjah Mada (PSKP UGM), Dr. Achmad Munjid, emphasized that any allegations must be supported by evidence, data, and a clear understanding to be considered valid.
According to Dr. Munjid, treason essentially means an attempt to seize power.
“The groups capable of seizing power are those that are well-organized, with a clear mass base, defined structures, and direct access to power,” he explained on Friday (Sep. 12).
Dr. Munjid argued that such accusations are a strategy to instill fear among the masses by creating the impression of an attempted coup. He said this method is often used to justify acts of repression.
“So, if repressive measures are applied, they appear legitimate. But again, there is no data, no evidence,” the scholar added.
Beyond being seen as reckless, Dr. Munjid viewed President Prabowo’s statement as reflecting the fears of the elites, who feel insecure about their positions due to weak legitimacy from a non-transparent, unfair, and closed process.
He stated that such accusations indicate a militaristic tendency within the democratic system. In a functioning democracy, everyone has the right to speak, assemble, and express opinions, which institutions should guarantee.
“A person expressing an opinion cannot be criminalized,” he said.
According to Dr. Munjid, unfounded accusations are often used to weaken political opponents or silence dissenting voices.
He stressed that society must be more active, critical, and engaged, since democracy can only thrive with active public participation.
“The elite should not view the people’s active political participation as a threat,” he remarked.
Dr. Munjid further noted that the achievements of the 1998 reform agenda have regressed, particularly in terms of freedom of expression, the persistence of corruption, collusion, and nepotism, as well as the resurgence of dual military functions.
“The covert arrests or disappearances of demonstrators cannot be denied as part of intimidation and repression against freedom of speech. Therefore, the democratic movement must be more active and united. Civil society must consolidate more effectively to monitor the regime and prevent the abuse of power,” he asserted.
Author: Alena Damaris
Editor: Gusti Grehenson
Post-editor: Rajendra Arya
Illustration: Detik