UGM Expert Highlights Positive and Negative Impacts of Proposed Centralization of Civil Servant Transfers

The proposal to centralize authority over civil servant (ASN) transfers, shifting this power from local governments to the central government through a revision of the ASN Bill, has sparked debate. Critics argue that the move would grant the central government excessive control over regional administration.

Public policy expert at Universitas Gadjah Mada (UGM), Dr. Subarsono, stated that the proposal allowing the central government to transfer regional officials contradicts Law No. 32 of 2004, which mandates that all governmental affairs, except for foreign policy, defense, security, justice, national monetary and fiscal policy, and religion, be delegated to local governments. 

“If the central government takes over the authority to determine civil servant transfers in regional offices, is that in line with the mandate of Law No. 32 of 2004?” he questioned on Monday (May 5).

He also noted that shifting transfer authority to the central government could reduce the power of local administrations while expanding central authority. This, he warned, could lead to resistance from regional leaders. 

Moreover, local heads from political parties supporting the government and part of the United Indonesia Coalition may also oppose the proposal.

Dr. Subarsono further explained that local leaders might feel disadvantaged, especially if they have invested in improving civil servant competencies through local budgets, including funding for training, further education, and study leave, only to see those officials abruptly transferred by the central government.

On the other hand, he added, a centralized transfer system could open broader career opportunities for civil servants across different regions. 

“The question is, are civil servants willing to be transferred to the central government or to other regions? Some may prefer to remain in their original posts due to personal and financial considerations, especially given the current economic climate,” he said.

According to Dr. Subarsono, another potential benefit is that centralized transfers could standardize processes and reduce the risk of corruption, collusion, and nepotism at the local level. Additionally, they could help prepare civil servants to serve in any location nationwide.

Nonetheless, Dr. Subarsono recommended that the proposal not be hastily implemented through a revision of the ASN Law. He emphasized the need for thorough preparation involving dialogue with central and regional stakeholders, experts, and academic institutions. 

“This will ensure that all parties reach a well-founded conclusion,” he stated.

Author: Leony

Editor: Gusti Grehenson

Illustration: Getty Images